Kansas.gov logo
Home



get adobe reader
Home Partners & Providers

Partners in Juvenile Justice

JJA Partners provide many levels of support for the youth of Kansas. Some partner groups are appointed by the Governor, others contract with JJA to provide services at the local level.

JJA Partners

How JJA Partners with Kansas Communities

A major initiative of the juvenile justice reform act is based on the development of a strong state and local partnership. JJA works closely with county governments and community-based agencies in the implementation and operation of juvenile justice services at the local level.

Each judicial district is required to have three core programs operational at the local level:

  • Juvenile Intake and Assessment (JIAS)
  • Juvenile Intensive Supervision Probation (JISP)
  • Community Case Management (CCMA)

JJA distributes funds to the administrative county in each judicial district for the operation of these programs. Technical assistance is provided by JJA to assist districts in the delivery of services to youth who come in contact with these community based juvenile justice programs. Standards and procedures are developed to provide guidance in the operation of these programs.

Prevention Services and Programs

A major initiative of the Juvenile Justice Reform Act is the development of prevention programs as a part of the continuum of juvenile justice services. Prior to 1997, this had not been a focus of the juvenile justice system. Research at the national level indicates that prevention programming for at-risk youth and first time offenders can be highly effective in reducing juvenile crime and preventing the increasing long term cost of repeat offending. JJA supports and assists communities in developing successful programs that will help reduce risk factors and enhance protective factors. Communities are encouraged to create partnerships with other agencies that have a key interest in prevention focused services (schools, regional prevention centers, community mentoring programs) in order to maximize both funding and program capabilities. Prevention programs cover a wide range of service needs at the community level.

These programs target youth who are in need of pro-social adult role models to address adolescent behavior problems. College students, community volunteers, members of the business community, school personnel, and others provide positive social and material reinforcement to youth, allowing them to be connected to adults who promote healthy beliefs and clear standards. These programs offer opportunities for youth to interact with pro-social adults and peers and learn new skills in a safe, supportive environment.

Programs such as mentoring, after school programs, and recreation programs address several risk factors: Early and Persistent Antisocial Behavior, Friends Who Engage in Problem Behavior, Lack of Commitment to School, and Rebelliousness.

Juvenile Justice Outcomes Overview

JJA believes that programs, which receive state and federal funding need to be held accountable to ensure programs are programmatically sound and cost effective.

The community planning process uses the Communities That Care prevention strategy which is outcome-based. Communities are trained to measure and calculate outcomes of each program.

Community Boundaries

Below is a map of judicial districts within Kansas.

Community Boundaries

Counties by Judicial District

Counties in Judicial Districts 1 through 4

District 1

  • Atchison
  • Leavenworth

District 2

  • Jackson
  • Jefferson
  • Pottawatomie
  • Wabaunsee

District 3

  • Shawnee

District 4

  • Anderson
  • Coffey
  • Franklin
  • Osage
Counties in Districts 5 through 8

District 5

  • Chase
  • Lyon

District 6

  • Bourbon
  • Linn
  • Miami

District 7

  • Douglas

District 8

  • Dickinson
  • Geary
  • Marion
  • Morris
Counties in Districts 9 through 12

District 9

  • Harvey
  • McPherson

District 10

  • Johnson

District 11

  • Cherokee
  • Crawford
  • Labette

District 12

  • Cloud
  • Jewell
  • Lincoln
  • Mitchell
  • Republic
  • Washington
Counties in Districts 13 through 16

District 13

  • Butler
  • Elk
  • Greenwood

District 14

  • Chautauqua
  • Montgomery

District 15

  • Cheyenne
  • Logan
  • Sheridan
  • Sherman
  • Rawlins
  • Thomas
  • Wallace

District 16

  • Clark
  • Comanche
  • Ford
  • Gray
  • Kiowa
  • Meade
Counties in Districts 17 through 20

District 17

  • Decatur
  • Graham
  • Norton
  • Osborne
  • Phillips
  • Smith

District 18

  • Sedgwick

District 19

  • Cowley

District 20

  • Barton
  • Ellsworth
  • Rice
  • Russell
  • Stafford
Counties in Districts 21 through 24

District 21

  • Clay
  • Riley

District 22

  • Brown
  • Doniphan
  • Marshall
  • Nemaha

District 23

  • Ellis
  • Gove
  • Rooks
  • Trego

District 24

  • Edwards
  • Hodgeman
  • Lane
  • Ness
  • Pawnee
  • Rush
Counties in Districts 25 through 28

District 25

  • Finney
  • Greeley
  • Hamilton
  • Kearny
  • Scott
  • Wichita

District 26

  • Grant
  • Haskell
  • Morton
  • Seward
  • Stanton
  • Stevens

District 27

  • Reno

District 28

  • Ottawa
  • Saline
Counties in Districts 29 through 31

District 29

  • Wyandotte

District 30

  • Barber
  • Harper
  • Kingman
  • Pratt
  • Sumner

District 31

  • Allen
  • Neosho
  • Wilson
  • Woodson