K.A.R. 69-12-5. Fees. The following fees shall be charged:
New tanning facility license fee.........................$100.00
Tanning facility license Annual renewal fee.... $100.00 $75.00
Delinquent renewal fee.....................................
Reinstatement fee............................................. $200.00
(Authorized by K.S.A. 2012 Supp. 65-1926 and K.S.A. 74-2702a; implementing K.S.A. 2012 Supp. 65-1926; effective Dec. 13, 1993; amended P-_____________.)
** Strike-through text denotes text that is currently in the regulation but is proposed to be removed. **
** Underlined text denotes text that is proposed to be added to the regulation.**
Economic Impact Statement for K.A.R. 69-12-5
I. Summary of Proposed Regulation, Including Its Purpose.
K.A.R. 69-12-5 designates the fees approved by the Board for the tanning profession. The purpose of this regulation is to determine the fees that will actually be charged by the Board (up to a maximum amount set by K.S.A. 65-1926) for each license type or delinquent renewal.
II. Reason(s) the Proposed Regulation is Required, Including Whether or Not the Regulation is Mandated by Federal Law.
This regulation is being amended to reduce the annual tanning facility license renewal fee and the delinquent renewal fee to provide greater uniformity among the Board’s governed professions and related fees. This regulation is not mandated by federal law, and, therefore, the regulation does not exceed the requirements of federal law.
III. Anticipated Economic Impact upon the Kansas Board of Cosmetology.
For the annual tanning facility license renewal, the Board anticipates an 25% decrease in revenue, or approximately $13,700 annually for the agency. In FY2012, 10 facilities were charged the delinquent fee for failure to timely renew, resulting in $500 in additional agency revenue. Reducing the fee would reduce this amount by 50%, which is negligible in the Board’s annual budget.
IV. Anticipated Economic Impact upon Other Governmental Agencies.
The Board does not anticipate economic impact on other governmental agencies.
V. Anticipated Economic Impact upon Private Businesses, Individuals, and Consumers.
Reducing the fees associated with renewals will result in a $25 savings for facilities who timely renew their license and a $50 savings for facility owners who renew late.
VI. Less Costly or Intrusive Methods That Were Considered, but Rejected, and the Reason for Rejection.
The Board does not find any less costly or intrusive methods.